Bluemerle

lgf: Word 5 vs. Word 2004

Charles Johnson's simple Word 2004 overlay experiment may be proof that the memo forgery is circa 2004.

Earlier versions of Word using the same settings and Times New Roman font look different. It's the Word 2004 version that's a perfect match... that would strongly suggest the memos are very recently concocted.

It seems fairly clear now that Burkett was at minimum a conduit for these memos.
Quirks in the language suggest that the forger *was* Burkett or someone who used his way of expressing things, perhaps because they spent time talking to him about the subject.


I think there is a chance that Burkett, trying to keep things from being traced to him, would have used a "hired" computer for the job. A Kinkos account would be handy for that.

Kinkos keeps their machines running with the latest software, and a Kinkos machine would definitely have Word 2004.
Wouldn't there still be some trace of those memos on the Kinkos machine, if that were the case?

Just asking.